Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

STATE OF KERALA versus GEORGE JOSEPH

Decided
12 February 1996
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official
[1996] 2 S.C.R. 465 · 1996 INSC 228

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Though notice was issued to the respondent, no unserved acknowledgment has been received so far. Therefore, notice must be deemed to have been served on the respondent.

p. 465, margin E

Leave granted.

p. 465, margin E

The point in the case is no longer res integra. The award of the Collector is dated March 27, 1981 and the notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is of September 26, 1978. Therefore, the respondent is not entitled to the payment of the additional amount under Section 23(1A) of that Act.

p. 465, margin F

The appeals are accordingly allowed. The award to the above extent is set aside. No costs. G.N. Appeals allowed.

p. 465, margin G