Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus THE CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR AND ORS.

Decided
18 November 1996
Judges listed
J.S. VERMA, B.N. KIRPAL (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official
[1996] SUPP. 8 S.C.R. 685 · 1996 INSC 1319
Not shown
1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Unnumbered paragraph

The point involved in this case is the same as in Civil Appeal No. 54 of I 993, R. Thiruvirko/am v. The Presiding Officer and Anr. For the reasons given by us in the judgment delivered today in R. Thiruvirkolam, it must be held that the order of removal from service in the present case operates from December 12, 1969 when it was made by the employer and not from any subsequent date. The direction made in the impugned judgment for payment of wages to the deceased workman from December 12, 1969 to December 7, 1987, the date of his death is, therefore, set aside. However, the amount of Rs. 50,000 paid to the heirs of the deceased workman under the interim order of the Court is not required to be refunded by them to the employer.

pp. 685–686, margin G

Unnumbered paragraph

Consequently, the appeal is allowed in the above terms. No costs. R.P. Appeal allowed.

p. 686, margin B