Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

STATE OF HARYANA versus DHARAMPAL, WATER PUMP OPERATOR AND ORS.

Decided
7 November 1996
Judges listed
A.M. AHMADI, SUJATA V. MANOHAR (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official
[1996] SUPP. 8 S.C.R. 599 · 1996 INSC 1306

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Delay condoned. Leave granted.

p. 599, margin F

For reasons set out in our judgment and order dated November 7, 1996 pronounced today in Civil Appeal No 14223of1996 (Arising out of S.L.P. (CJ NO. 27150 of 1995) etc. etc., these appeals are also allowed A and the judgments and orders of the High Court are set aside with no order as to costs. R.P. Appeals allowed.

pp. 599–600, margin G