Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

DR. CHIITARANJAN SHARMA AND ORS. versus THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ANR.

Decided
19 September 1996
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, FAIZAN UDDIN, G.B. PATTANAIK (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Dismissed

Citations

Official
[1996] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 526 · 1996 INSC 1078

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Unnumbered paragraph

These appeals by special leave arise from the order of the Administrative Tribunal made on December 15, 1986. Admittedly the H.I.M. Ayurvedic Degree College, Paprola, District Kangra was taken over by the Government and handed over to the H.P. Health and Family Welfare Department. Clause (3) of the agreement envisages as under :

p. 526, margin F

Unnumbered paragraph

"The service of the existing staff, principal, Teaching Administrative and other employed on regular basis in the college who fulfil the requisite qualifications and age conditions may be taken over with effect from 3.3.1978 after due screening if done by a screening committee constituted for this purpose by the Government in which 2 members i.e. principal and Manager from the Managing Committee shall also be included. Service of the present employees

pp. 526–527, margin G

Unnumbered paragraph

will be protected according to Government rules."

p. 527, margin A

Unnumbered paragraph

In accordance therewith, the existing staff, principal, teaching, administrative and other employees employed on regular basis in the college were eligible to be absorbed on regular basis provided they fulfilled the following conditions : (1) they were appointed on regular basis in the college before taking over; (2) they possessed the requisite qualifications prescribed for the posts; and (3) they fulfilled the age condition at the time of taking over w.e.f. March 3, 1978. On fulfilment of all these conditions, they would be sent to a screening committee constituted for the purpose by the Government including to members, i.e., the Principal and Manager to the Managing Committee to represent the employees in the screening committee. On recommendation made by the Committee, the regular absorption could be made.

p. 527, margin B

Unnumbered paragraph

Unfortunately, the appellants were not regularly appointed; nor did they possess the requisite qualifications for absorption on regular basis in the posts as on the date of the take over. Resultantly, mstead of throwing them out of service by retrenchment, the Government issued the order exercising the power under proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution on May 24,1980 in consultation with the Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission and Rules for Recruitment and Promotion of the Ayurvedic College employees, Paprola, District Kangra. Admittedly, the appellant even than did not satisfy those qualifications prescribed under the Rules. Resultantly, they were absorbed in suitable administrative posts to which they are eligible. When they challenged their absorption, the Tribunal in the impugned order directed to maintain the scale of pay which they were drawing on the date of the take over and directed their absorption in the posts of Ayurvedic Chikitsa Adhikaris etc. Thus, these appeals by special leave.

p. 527, margin D

Unnumbered paragraph

It is seen that since the appellant had not fulfilled the requisite qualifications either when they were initially appointed by the committee before take over nor when statutory rules were made by the Governor so as to enable for absorption. Instead of retrenching them from service due to nor-fulfilment of the requisite qu.llif'ications, the Government came to absorb them in the Ayurvedic Chikitsa Adhikaris posts etc. to which they are eligible. The Tribunal has given the direction to maintain the pay-scales and to make adjustment and absorption. In our view directions are correct and based on equity and do not call for any interfere!lce. They may also be considered for further promotion from the absorbed posts in accordanc~, with the rules.

pp. 527–528, margin G

Unnumbered paragraph

The appeals are accordingly dismissed. No. costs. G.N. Appeals dismissed.

p. 528, margin B