Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

PREM CHANDRA AGARWAL & ANR. versus U.P. FINANCIAL CORPN. & ORS.

Decided
23 April 2009
Judges listed
MARKANDEY KATJU, H.L. DATTU (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Dismissed

Citations

Official
[2009] 6 S.C.R. 931 · 2009 INSC 597
Also cited as
  • (2009) 11 SCC 479 (17 citing judgments)
  • 2009 SCC OnLine SC 881 (2 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 1 other Supreme Court judgment we hold.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: no paragraphs could be read from our copy of this judgment.