Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

MAHESH KUMAR AGAL versus DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE AND ANR.

Decided
15 December 1995
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Dismissed

Citations

Official
[1995] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 795 · 1995 INSC 913

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Leave granted.

p. 795, margin F

Passing the Hindi test is a condition for promotion and since the appellant had passed the lest on September 20, 1981, he was given promotion and seniority was fixed with effect from the passing of the said test. Under these·circumstances, we do not find aoy illegality in the order passed hy the Tribunal warranting interference.

p. 795, margin F

The appeal is accordingly dismissed. R.P. Appeal dismissed.

p. 795, margin G