Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

SATE OF HARYANA versus TRILOK CHAND AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

Decided
8 December 1995
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Dismissed

Citations

Official
[1995] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 359 · 1995 INSC 865

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Leave granted.

p. 359, margin F

In view of the order passed by this Court giving peremptory time to bring the Legal Representatives on record within six weeks from July 28, 1995, no steps have been taken. As a result, the appeals as against respondent No. 2 stand dismissed without any further reference to the Court. Since the appeals have been dismissed against one of them and the award being common and indivisible, the appeals stand abated as against all. The appeals are dismissed. No costs. R.P. Appeals dismissed.

p. 359, margin F