Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. versus OM PRAKASH AND ORS.

Decided
30 November 1995
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, S.B. MAJMUDAR (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official
[1995] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 837 · 1995 INSC 820

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Unnumbered paragraph

Leave granted.

p. 837, margin F

Unnumbered paragraph

This Court in C.A. No. 1879/93 and batch title The State of Punjab & Ors. v. Mis. Vinod Kumar & Ors. by order dated May 10, 1994 allowed the appeals and remitted the matter for fresh consideration by the High Court. This Court also made it clear that it had not expressed any opinion on merits. The High Court was free to dispose of the matters in accordance with law. The same question arises in this case. Under these circumstances, the appeal is allowed and the matter is remitted to the High Court for fresh decision in the light of the above order. No costs. T.N.A. Appeal allowed,

p. 837, margin F