Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

STATE OF KERALA versus M.M. ABDUL KHADER

Decided
15 December 1995
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official
[1995] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 784 · 1995 INSC 909

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Unnumbered paragraph

Leave granted.

p. 784, margin G

Unnumbered paragraph

The only controversy is as regards the entitlement of the respondents to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Since the award of the Collector is of June 4, 1979, the claimants are not entitled to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the said Act.

p. 784, margin G

Unnumbered paragraph

The appeal is accordingly allowed to the above extent. The Order of the High Court is set aside. No costs. CA. No. 12121 of 1995 Leave granted.

p. 785, margin A

Unnumbered paragraph

The only controversy with which we are concerned in this appeal is as regards the entitlement of the respondents to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Ac~ 1894. Since the award of the Collector is of April 21, 1980, the claimants are not entitled to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the said Act.

p. 785, margin B

Unnumbered paragraph

The appeal is accordingly allowed to the above extent. The order of the High Court is set aside. No costs. R.P. Appeals allowed.

p. 785, margin C