Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

KALYAN versus GORAKH

Decided
13 December 1995
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[1995] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 659 · 1995 INSC 891

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Leave granted.

p. 660, margin A

Having heard the counsel on both sides, we are satisfied that there is no need to disturb the findings recorded by the High Court. However, the High Court having found the appellant in possession of the land after he had purchased the property from the erstwhile landlord of the respondent, a protected tenant under the provisions of the Hyderabad Tenancy And Agricultural Land Act, 1950; and so, needed some protection, it directed appointment of receiver. In view of the finding that the appellant is in possession, we feel that in the interest of justice, the appellant would continue in possession but should deposit a sum of Rs. 10,000 every year from the year 1991 onwards to the credit of the suit and keep depositing the same till the disposal of the suit etc. In the event of the respondent succeeding in the suit, he is entitled to withdraw the same. As soon as the appellant shall deposit the arrears as on date within a period of three months from today and before 31st January of each year, the trial court is

p. 660, margin A

directed to keep that amount in interest yielding deposit securities in a nationalised Bank. In the event of the respondent's succeeding, he would be entitled to withdraw the amount with interest accrued thereon. The trial court is directed to dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six months from the date of the receipt of this order.

p. 660, margin C

The appeal is accordingly disposed of in terms of the above order. No costs. R.P. Appeal disposed of.

p. 660, margin E