Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

RAJESH RANJAN @ PAPPU YADAV versus STATE OF BIHAR THR. CBI

Decided
5 August 2010
Judges listed
MARKANDEY KATJU, A.K. PATNAIK (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Dismissed

Citations

Official
[2010] 9 S.C.R. 690 · 2010 INSC 483

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Paragraph numbering in our copy is uncertain (unnumbered_in_numbered_era). Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

This Review Petition has been filed seeking review of this Court's order dated May 03, 2010, whereby we have set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 18.02.2009 granting bail to the petitioner herein. It was directed that the petitioneraccused Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav be taken into custody forthwith.

p. 691, margin A

An application for exemption from surrendering has also been filed with this review petition. We are surprised to note that despite cancellation of bail of the accused by this Court, neither the accused has surrendered nor he has been taken into custody.

p. 691, margin C

We have carefully gone through the review petition and the connected papers as also the application for exemption from surrendering. We do not find any merit therein and they are dismissed accordingly.

p. 691, margin D

The CBI and Director General of Police, Bihar are directed to execute the order of this Court dated May 03, 2010 forthwith and send a compliance report to this Court within four weeks from today. R.P. Review Petition dismissed.

p. 691, margin E