Supreme Court of India
LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, PUNJAB versus ANUDEEP KAUR AND ORS.
- Decided
- 8 December 1995
- Judges listed
- K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA
- Disposal
- Appeal(s) allowed
Citations
- Official
- [1995] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 357 · 1995 INSC 864
Cited by
We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.
Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.
The Court's text
Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.
Leave graoted.
p. 357, margin G
The controversy is no longer res-integra as regards entitlement to payment of additional amount under section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as amended by act 68 of 1984. The award of the Land Acquisition Officer is dated July 30, 1981. Therefore, Section 23(1-A) has no application to the award in question. Under these circumstances, the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to amend the award and decree awarding additional amount under Section 23(1-A). The High Court equally commilted an error of law in dismissing the civil revision in that behalf.
pp. 357–358, margin G
The appeals are accordingly allowed to the above extent. No costs. R.P. Appeals allowed.
p. 358, margin B