Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

BAHADUR SINGH NARODA AND ORS. versus STATE OF M.P. ORS.

Decided
7 December 1995
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Dismissed

Citations

Official
[1995] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 314 · 1995 INSC 856

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Leave granted.

p. 314, margin H

After .notice was issued confining to the question as to "why the petitioners may not be continued till the regularly selected candidates are appointed and taken charge", counter-affidavit has been filed by one c:L. Khanna, Deputy D.S.E. in the office of the Joint Director, Public Instructions, Bhopal Division, Bhopal (M.P.). It is stated therein that the regularly selected candidates have already been appointed and taken charge, vide Annexure R. In that Annexure, the respective dates on which the selected candidates have taken charge have been given.

p. 315

Under these circumstances, the limited relief for which notice was issued cannot be granted. The appeals are dismissed. R.P. Appeals dismissed.

p. 315, margin B