Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

SANJAY INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING COMPANY versus THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

Decided
6 December 1995
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, FAIZAN UDDIN, B.N. KIRPAL (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Dismissed

Citations

Official
[1995] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 287 · 1995 INSC 850

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Unnumbered paragraph

Leave granted.

p. 287, margin G

Unnumbered paragraph

Heard the counsel on both sides. Since the Civil Court and the High Court have gone into the question whether the letter dated July 5, 1979 is part of the agreement dated July 17, 1979 and have held that the letter did not form an integral part of the agreement, the agreement does not contain any obligation to pay at the rate of Rs. 432 per Hume pipe to the appellant. This being a finding of fact, we do not find any error of law warranting interference.

pp. 287–288, margin G

Unnumbered paragraph

It is next contended that the arbitrator committed legal misconduct in declining to grant the amount claimed. We do not find any substance in the contention. Moreover, the contention was not argued in the High Court. Therefore, we cannot allow the counsel to address this contention here in this appeal.

p. 288, margin A

Unnumbered paragraph

The appeal is dismissed. No. costs. R.P. Appeal dismissed.

p. 288, margin C