Supreme Court of India
M/S. KASHMIR ELECTRIC AND HARDWARE CORPORATION versus STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
- Decided
- 26 July 1996
- Judges listed
- M.M. PUNCHHI, K. VENKATASWAMI
- Disposal
- Appeal(s) allowed
Citations
- Official
- [1996] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 147 · 1996 INSC 796
Cited by
We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.
Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.
The Court's text
Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.
Leave granted.
p. 147, margin E
We have before us the judgment of the learned single Judge of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court holding that the Arbitrator had not misconducted himself or the proceedings. We also have before us the appellate judgment of the Letters Patent Bench under appeal saying to the contrary. The misconduct blown up is that the Arbitrator had conducted sitting/sittings in the premi,es owned by the appellants and had during that while accepted tea and refreshment from them and hence to have become guilty of misconduct. It is admitted that he was not alone in that regard as both the contesting parties before him had equally shared the use of the premises for the purpose as well as refreshments as part of courtesies. No objection of any sort, at any point of time, was taken by any one either with regard to the place of conduct of the proceedings or to those courtesies e>.tended in the form of refreshment. We fail lo appreciate as to how could the arbitrator be presumed to have corrupted himself in accepting those courtesies, in these facts and circumstances. Mr. Ashok Mathur, learned counsel appearing for the Slate of .Tammu and Kashmir is candid enough to stale lhal he is unable to support the decision of the Letters Patent Bench of the High Court in any manner. We, therefore, without going into further details, allow this appeal, set aside the impugned judgment and order of the Letters Patent Bench and restore that of the learned Single Judge without any order as to costs. R.P. Appeal allowed.
pp. 147–148, margin F