Supreme Court of India
SABIR HUSSAIN AND ANR. versus STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
- Decided
- 30 November 1995
- Judges listed
- K. RAMASWAMY
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Citations
- Official
- [1995] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 15 · 1995 INSC 812
Cited by
We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.
Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.
The Court's text
Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.
Though the case has been called twice, the appellants are not present in person. We have taken the assistance of Shri K.S. Chauhan, learned counsel appearing for the State.
p. 15, margin G
The controversy raised in this case is covered by the Judgment of this Court in Ramesh Chand v. State of U.P., [1980] 1 SCR 498 where this Court had held that "failure to specify number of services would not invalidate the draft scheme under Section 68C or the approved scheme trnder Section 680 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939". Same is the question in these appeals also. Under these circumstances, the omission to specify the number of services in the approved scheme does not invalidate the scheme already approved.
pp. 15–16, margin G
The appeals are accordingly dismissed but in the circumstances without costs. T.N.A. Appeals dismissed.
p. 16, margin B