Supreme Court of India
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH versus STATE OF NAGALAND AND ORS.
- Decided
- 17 December 1997
- Judges listed
- S.C. SEN, M. JAGANNADHA RAO
- Disposal
- Disposed off
Citations
- Official
- [1997] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 593 · 1997 INSC 825
Cited by
We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.
Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.
The Court's text
Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.
Leave granted. Although elaborate arguments have been advanced by the Attorney-General on behalf of the State of Uttar Pradesh, the Solicitor General on behalf of the Union of India and Mr. Shanti Bhushan on behalf of the State of Nagaland. We will not go into the merits of the case at all. We have been informed that the writ petition even al the admission stage has been heard at length. The judgment is awaited. This is only an appeal from an interim order. Since the judgment is going to be pronounced shortly we are disinclined to interfere with the interim order passed at this stage. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The Court hearing this matter will be entirely free to decide the case in accordance with law. The appeals are disposed of accordingly.
pp. 593–594, margin F
T.P. Nos. 418-421/97
p. 594, margin A
In view of the above decision in SLP (C) Nos. 21304 07/97, no order is passed on the Transfer petitions at this stage. The Transfer Petitions are also disposed of accordingly. T.N.A. Appeal and T.P. disposed of.
p. 594, margin A