Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

SWADESI JAGARAN MANCH versus STATE OF ORISSA & ANR.

Decided
4 July 2011
Judges listed
R.V. RAVEENDRAN, B. SUDERSHAN REDDY (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Hearing Adjourned

Citations

Official
[2011] 8 S.C.R. 723 · 2011 INSC 433

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Transfer Petition (C) Nos.92/2009, 152/2009, 168/2009, A 185/2009 and 218/2009 are allowed and the following writ petitions are transferred from the respective High Court to this Court:

pp. 723–724, margin G

(1) WP(C) No.4204/2006 on the file of the Madras High

p. 724

Court (2) WP(C) No.341/2006 on the file of the Bombay High

p. 724

Court (3) WP(C) No.13082/2006 on the file of the Andhra

p. 724, margin B

Pradesh High Court

p. 724, margin B

(4) WP(C) No.13354/2006 on the file of the Karnataka c High Court (5) PIL No. 61/2006 on the file of the Bombay High

p. 724, margin B

Court

p. 724, margin B

2

Judgment is pronounced in WP(C) No.80 of 2006 and the aforesaid five transferred cases, allowing them in terms of the Judgement.

p. 724, margin B

3

Writ Petition (Civil) No.175/2006 and Transfer Case (Civil) No.11/2002 are delinked from the aforesaid cases which are disposed of, as they do not relate to challenge to Rule 44- 1 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules 1955. Transfer Case (Civil) No.11/2002 seeks quashing of a notification dated 15.10.2001 issued by the Director of Health Services, Orissa prohibiting sale and manufacture of common salt other than iodised salt for human consumption, issued in exercise of power under the relevant state Rules. Writ Petition (Civil) F No.175/2006 is filed seeking a direction to the central government to frame a uniform policy for the control of goitre and a direction regarding imposing ban on the manufacture of non-iodised salt all over the country.

p. 724, margin D

4

While disposing of Writ Petition (Civil) No.80/2006, we have granted six months time to review the position regarding universal iodisation. In view of the above, list these two matters for further orders, after six months. D.G. Writ Petition (c) No. 175 of 2006 and Transfer case (c) No. 11 of 2002 are pending.

p. 724, margin E