Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

DAKSHABEN B. PATEL versus THE ADMINISTRATOR, U.T. OF DAMAN AND DIU AND 4 ORS.

Decided
10 November 1995
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official
[1995] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 436 · 1995 INSC 712

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Unnumbered paragraph

Leave granted.

p. 436, margin H

Unnumbered paragraph

The Tribunal, vide order dated January 13, 1992 with the consent of the counsel for the respondents, had extended six months' time to obtain the M. Phil Degree. The Notification dated July 6, 1992 clearly shows that the appellant has obtained the degree in M. Phil and she is one of the candidates declared by the Board of Examiners as eligible for degree of M. Phil in Economics. Under these circumstances, the appeal is allowed and O.A. stands disposed of.

p. 437, margin A

Unnumbered paragraph

Respondents are directed to refer the case of the appellant for regularisation to the UPSC which would be done according to rules. G.N. Appeal allowed.

p. 437, margin B