Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

ASHOK KUMAR & ORS. versus THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.

Decided
14 May 2018
Judges listed
JASTI CHELAMESWAR, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Order modified

Citations

Official
[2018] 7 S.C.R. 765 · 2018 INSC 495

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Paragraph numbering in our copy is uncertain (unnumbered_in_numbered_era). Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

On the matter being mentioned, the learned counsel for the parties stated that there may not be necessity of a direction as contained in paragraphs 25 and 26 of the judgment passed by this Court on 11.5.2018, which accordingly stand deleted.

p. 765, margin F

They further plead that paragraph 27 of the said judgment may be read as under:

p. 765, margin G

“The respondent will ensure that the differential mandatory benefits including increments are remitted to the appellants within a period of three months from the date of the order.” Ordered accordingly.

p. 766, margin A