Supreme Court of India

THANGAIYA versus STATE OF TAMIL NADU

Decided: 8 December 2004
Judges listed: ARIJIT PASAYAT (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Case Partly allowed

Citations

Official

[2004] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 786 · 2004 INSC 703

Also cited as

(2005) 9 SCC 650 (40 citing judgments)
(2005) SCC(CRI) 1284 (6 citing judgments)
AIR 2005 SC 1142 (2 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

2 other citation strings that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 16 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

RAJESH YADAV & ANR versus STATE OF U.P. 4 February 2022 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 27
SURESH AND ANR versus STATE OF HARYANA 21 August 2018 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 44
HIRALAL PANDEY AND ORS. versus STATE OF U.P 17 April 2012 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 9 and 1 other paragraph
VEERAN & ORS. versus STATE OF M.P. 13 April 2011 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 18
JARNAIL SINGH & ORS. versus STATE OF PUNJAB 26 August 2009 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 15

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.