Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

UNITED BIOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED versus ORCHID CHEMICALS AND PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED AND ORS.

Decided
17 January 2018
Judges listed
RANJAN GOGOI, NAVIN SINHA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official
[2018] 6 S.C.R. 960 · 2018 INSC 31

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

1

Upon hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, the judgment of this Court dated 29th November, 2017 passed in Civil Appeal Nos.4767- 4769 of 2011 and other connected matters is modified in the following terms. (i) In paragraph 13, the words “The arguments advanced on behalf of the appellants in the appeals” shall be substituted by the words “The arguments advanced on behalf of the appellants in Civil Appeal Nos.4767- 4769 of 2001 and respondents in the appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.27309 of 2012”. (ii) In paragraph 14, the words “In reply, on behalf of the respondent”, shall be substituted by the words “In reply, on behalf of the respondents in Civil Appeal Nos.4767-4769 of 2001 and appellant in the appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.27309 of 2012”. (iii) Paragraph 37 shall read as under: 37. In the light of the above while answering the question arising in the manner indicated above, we dismiss Civil Appeal Nos.4767- 4679 of 2001 and Civil Appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.1851 of 2009 and allow the civil appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 27309 of 2012.

pp. 960–961, margin G

2

The application is allowed in the above terms.

p. 961, margin D