Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

MOHD. QAISER versus L.K. SINHA AND ORS.

Decided
6 November 1995
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, B.N. KIRPAL (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[1995] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 793 · 1995 INSC 694

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

In the affidavit filed by the respondents, it is staled that the General Manager came to know of the order of this Court for the first time on September 27, 1995 and immediately he directed payment of the amount. A cheque had been drawn in favour of the petitioner for a sum of Rs. 50,000 on September 29, 1995 and the cheque was offered to the petitioner. It is slated that he refused to accept the cheque on October 1, 1995 and then he was informed of the offer by Registered post with A.O. The cheque has been handed over to the counsel for the petitioner across the Bar. Under these circumstances, the compliance has been made, though belatedly.

p. 794, margin A

It is stated by the General Manager that action was initiated against the erring officials who had defaulted in compliance of the order of this Court. General Manager is directed to submit the report of the action taken and the result thereof to the Registry within 60 days from to-day. We accept the unconditional apology. The contempt proceedings are accordings disposed of. R.P. Petitioner disposed of.

p. 794, margin C