Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

STATE OF MANIPUR versus SHRI NAMBAM DWIJEN SINGH AND ORS.

Decided
2 November 1995
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[1995] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 731 · 1995 INSC 677

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Leave granted.

p. 732, margin A

This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and order dated March 22, 1994 passed in W.A. No. 27 of 1993 by the Gauhati High Court at Imphal. The High Court directed the appellant in the ultimate order thus :

p. 732, margin B

"Undisputedly after the judgment was passed in C.R. No. 132 of 1993 the vacant posts of Executive Engineer of the Civil Circle of the Electricity Department are filled up by putting the respondents incharge. It is not the case that the vacant posts are never filled up that being so the submission of Mr. Nandkumar that the Court cannot direct to fill up all vacant posts by the Govt. is without submissions. The subsequent policy decision if any to reorganise the Electricity Department is irrelevant as far as the valid;ty of the judgment and order dated 11.10.1993 passed iu Civil Rules No. 933 of 1993 is concerned. In the appeal our scrutiny is confined to the statements made in the C.R. No. 933 of 1993 and counter if any and not extraneous subsequent facts. We have persued the impugned _judgment and order and we do not find any infirmity

p. 732, margin C

and that being so the appeal is without merit and is dismissed." When the matter came up before us, we directed on November 25, thus:

p. 732, margin E

''ln the facts and circumstances, before deciding the actual controversy, it is necessary that the State Government should take a policy decision as to how many of the posts in each of electrical and civil engineering are required to be created and then the principles on the basis of which they are required to fill the posts. Until that is done, it is difficult to give any direction to consider 'the claims of the respective candidates in the respective branches. The State Government, therefore, is directed to consider and determine the restructure of the electrical and civil engineering departments and the required number of posts in each department and the qualifications prescribed and principles for filling up all

p. 732, margin F

those posts. Two months time is sought for and granted."

p. 733, margin A

Pursuant thereto, now, the Government has taken a policy decision reorganising the Department into two branches, viz., Executive Branch for Generation with 17 demarcated posts and Electrical Civil Division with four demarcated posts. In view of the policy decision, since the respondents fall in the category of Executive Civil Division, a D.P.C. would be constituted to consider the relative merits of the candidates to be selected as Executive Engineer and thereafter appointment would be made according to rules.

p. 733, margin A

The appeal is disposed of acconlingly. No costs. G.N. Appeal disposed.

p. 733, margin C