Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

SRI MANOHAR versus STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

Decided
2 November 1995
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[1995] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 725 · 1995 INSC 674

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Leave granted.

p. 725, margin G

In spite of an opportunity having been given to the respondents to file counter-affidavit by our order dated October 11, 1993, till date no counter-affidavit has been filed. The Tribunal had dismissed the case on the ground of !aches. In view of the fact that the respondents have not controverted the explanation given for the !aches, we find that there is some justification for the appellant to file the proceedings at belated stage. However, the relief cannot be granted here since no counter-affidavit has been filed. In the circumstances, we remit the matter to the Tribunal to examine the case on merits and dispose of the matter according to law.

pp. 725–726, margin G

The appeal is disposed of accordingly. No costs. G.N. Appeal disposed of.

p. 726, margin B