Supreme Court of India
PAPANNA AND ANR. ETC. versus STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC.
- Decided
- 1 November 1995
- Judges listed
- K. RAMASWAMY, B.N. KIRPAL
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Citations
- Official
- [1995] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 692 · 1995 INSC 665
Cited by
We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.
Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.
The Court's text
Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.
After Mr. KN. Bhat was designated as Senior Advocate, the Registry had issued noticed to all the appellants to make alternative arrangements as early as in 1987-88 and the same were served on all the appellants except appellant No. 2 who was reported to be dead. None has entered appearance through counsel nor did they appear in person today. As a matter of fact, it is the professional duty of the counsel, on being designated as Senior Advocate, to intimate that fact to all his clients and request them to make alternative arrangements to engage another advocate-on/record. It is no part of the duty of this Court to inform the parties. However, it has aheady been done. In view of the fact that the decree challenging the validity of the notification under section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act being common to all the appellants and being indivisible, the appeals stand abated against all since the legal representatives of the second appellant have not been brought on record till date.
p. 693, margin A
The appeals are accordingly dismissed. No costs. G.N Appeals dismissed.
p. 693, margin D