Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE versus M/S. KRIPA CHEMICALS PVT. LTD.

Decided
4 November 2004
Judges listed
ARIJIT PASAYAT (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[2004] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 970 · 2004 INSC 641

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Heard.

p. 971, margin A

This appeal involves two issues. One of them relates to the calculation of cost of production and whether excise duty paid on raw material, if modvatted, is to be included. in determining the cost of production of excisable products. This issue has been examined by this Court by a three Judge Bench in Collector of Central Excise, Pune v. Daiichi Karkaria Limited (1999) 112 353 SC and it was held that excise duty paid on raw material, if modvatted, is not to be included in determining the cost of production of excisable products. The other issue raised is the question as to whether profit earned by the job worker is to be included and to what extent? In the clarificatory order passed by this Court in Ujagar Prints etc. etc. v. Union of India and Ors., (l 989) 39 EL T 493 SC, it was explained by way of an illustration that the value of the raw material, the value of the job work done and the manufacturing profit and the expenses for the processing have to be taken into consideration. The determination of the excisable value shall be done on that basis. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. R.P. Appeal disposed of.

p. 971, margin A