Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

COMMISSIONER, SALEM MUNICIPALITY versus T. KURALMANI AND ANR.

Decided
30 October 1995
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official
[1995] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 563 · 1995 INSC 648

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Unnumbered paragraph

Leave granted.

p. 563, margin H

Unnumbered paragraph

Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, we think that the Tribunal, by the impugned order, was not justified in summarily disposing of the matter without considering the rival contentions which in the background of the facts of this case, ought to be gone into. Under these circumstances, the order of the Tribunal dated 10.1.1995 made in 0.A. 3427/90 is set aside. The matter is remitted to the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras, for a fresh disposal according to law. It is made clear that we are not expressing any opinion on merits and the Tribunal is free to consider the entire controversy in the light of the Government order and pass appropriate orders according to Rules.

p. 564, margin A

Unnumbered paragraph

The appeal is allowed accordingly. No costs. R.P. Appeal allowed.

p. 564, margin C