Supreme Court of India
SMT. YASHOMATJ HARSUKHLAL LATHIA AND ORS. versus SAURASHTRA KUTCH STOCK EXCHANGE AND ORS.
- Decided
- 30 October 1995
- Judges listed
- K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA
- Disposal
- Appeal(s) allowed
Citations
- Official
- [1995] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 522 · 1995 INSC 640
Cited by
We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.
Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.
The Court's text
Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.
Leave granted.
p. 523, margin A
Only controversy is whether t~e first appellant fulfilled the qualifications of 12th standard prescribed for consideration of her membership of the Stock Exchange. Admittedly, the appellant passed Matric which is equivalent to 11th standard in Gujarat Stale, Saurashtra region. The Saurashtra University Act, 1965 (Gujarat Act 39 of 1965) was amended by the Gujarat Secondary Education (Amendment) Act, 1978, (Gujarat Act No. 32 of 1978) which was published after receipt of the assent of the President in the "Gujarat Government Gazette" on the 29th September, 1978. It provided that in section 43 clause (i) after the words "Secondary School Certificate Examination" the words "in the eleventh standard or the Higher Secondary School Certificate Examination" shall be inserted. The Explanation thereto clearly amplifies that the "Higher Secondary School Certificate Examination" mea~s the examination of the students in the twelfth standard. The first appellant having passed the eleventh standard examination was thus qualified for consideration of membership of the Stock Exchange. The Screening Committee had rejected her petition on the ground that the first appellant had not have the qualification of 12th standard in that behalf; it was, however, not brought to its notice that by virtue of the aforementioned amendment, the eleventh standard was made equivalent to Higher Secondary Certificate Examination.
p. 523, margin B
In view of the legal position set out above, the first appellant is entitled to be considered by the appropriaie Committee whether she could be admitted as a member of the Saurashtra-Kutch Stock Exchange at Rajkot. The appeal is accordingly allowed. The Screening Committee would consider and dispose of the claim of the first appellant within a period of eight weeks from the dale of the receipt of this order. No. costs. R.P. Appeal allowed.
p. 523, margin E