Supreme Court of India

POONAM CHAND JAIN AND ANR. versus FAZRU

Decided: 12 October 2004
Judges listed: ARIJIT PASAYAT (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Disposed off

Citations

Official

[2004] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 525 · 2004 INSC 599

Also cited as

(2004) 13 SCC 269 (8 citing judgments)
AIR 2005 SC 38 (5 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 6 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

ASIAN RESURFACING OF ROAD AGENCY PVT. LTD. & ANR. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 28 March 2018 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 38
RAVINDER SINGH versus SUKHBIR SINGH & ORS. 11 January 2013 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 19
UDAI SHANKAR AWASTHI versus STATE OF U.P. ANR. 9 January 2013 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 17
SHIV SHANKAR SINGH versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. 22 November 2011 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 11
RANVIR SINGH versus STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. 1 September 2009 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 6

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.