Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

STATE OF TAMIL NADU REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT versus SIDDARAMAIAH, CHIEF MINISTER, GOVERNMENT OF KARNAKATA & ORS.

Decided
16 February 2018
Judges listed
DIPAK MISRA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[2018] 5 S.C.R. 1125 · 2018 INSC 154

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Paragraph numbering in our copy is uncertain (unnumbered_in_numbered_era). Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

DIPAK MISRA, CJI As we have disposed of Civil Appeal No. 2456 of 2007, we do not intend to proceed with the Contempt Petition against the respondents. It stands closed accordingly.

p. 1126, margin B