Supreme Court of India

STATE BANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPUR versus NATIONAL IRON AND STEEL ROLLING CORPORATION AND ORS.

Decided: 14 December 1994
Judges listed: S.C. AGRAWAL (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Dismissed

Citations

Official

[1994] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 566 · 1994 INSC 605

Also cited as

(1995) 2 SCC 19 (25 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 5 other Supreme Court judgments we hold.

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER versus O.L. OF ESSKAY PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED 8 November 2011 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 26 and 2 other paragraphs
MAHARASHTRA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. versus THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND ORS. 8 October 2009 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 22
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA versus STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. 27 February 2009 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 34
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus SICOM LTD. & ANR. 5 December 2008 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 15
R.M. ARUNACHALAM ETC. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS 9 July 1997 · bench of 2 judges

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.