Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

SHILPA versus ABHINAV

Decided
21 November 2008
Judges listed
ARIJIT PASAYAT (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[2008] 16 S.C.R. 502 · 2008 INSC 1333

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

1

This transfer petition was taken up at the Supreme Court Lok Adalat on 6th September, 2oos: After hearing the parties the following order was passed: .. "The wife, her father, her husband and his father have appeared in person and presented a joint. petition of settlement duly signed by all of them. They have been represented through their counsel. The parties have agreed to settle their dispute on the following terms as enumerated in the petition: (a) All criminal cases/complaints/FIRs/DDRs, filed by either party would be quashed. (b) Marriage between the parties would be dissolved by mutual consent divorce. (c) Abhinav, his parents, his brother and Bhabi and his two Mamas would collectively appear before an Aggarwal Sabha and acknowledge their wrongs committed on Shilpa. (d) In case any of these above seven persons fails to appear before the Sabha, Shilpa can revive her complaints. · (e) -The husband and father in taw Shri Ashok Gupta- - · < : :. ·· - Willj:)ayRsA0,00,000/- (RL!pees Forty Lakhs) within . . ·two mo~hths by Demand Draft drawn at Bhiwani i.n , . nc:tme of ShilJ?C!. (g) The husband, Shri Ashok Gupta aha ·other five persons will appear before Aggarwal Sabha, Prashant Vihar, Delhi, within· one' month from today -and apo~ogize in writing to the girl a.nd her family members. No further litigation of any nature will be started by parties on this account."

pp. 503–504, margin C

2

It is accepted that a sum of Rs.40,00,000/- by way of demand .draft has been deposited in. the registry of-this Court in: terms· of order dated 4. ~ 1.2008; The compromise is recorded in terms of what has been stated in the order dated 6:9.2008 . The demand draft be handed over by the registry to the learned counsel· f6r the· petitio'ner who shall file a receipt from the petitioner of. having received the draft. Ttie same· shall be done within two weeks frorri todai . 3, The transfer 'petition is accordingly.disp_osed of .. S.K.S . Petition disposed of. ~ ~ . .

p. 504, margin C