Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

MADHYA PRADESH RURAL ROAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. versus BACKBONE ENTERPRISES LIMITED AND ANR.

Decided
18 April 2018
Judges listed
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, R.F. NARIMAN (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[2018] 4 S.C.R. 268 · 2018 INSC 360
Also cited as
  • (2018) 10 SCC 826 (6 citing judgments)
  • (2018) 5 SCALE 103 (2 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

Cited in 2 other Supreme Court judgments we hold.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

1

Delay condoned. Leave granted.

p. 269, margin C

2

In view of judgment of this Court in Va Tech Escher Wyass Flovel Ltd. v. MPSE Board & Another, (2011) 13 SCC 261 having been overruled and as the High Court has relied on Judgment in C.R. NO.353 of 2004, Mahesh Chandra Garg v. State of M.P. and Ors. decided on 23.2.2010 which was based on Va Tech (supra), the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the M.P. Arbitration Tribunal so that the said Tribunal can deal with the matter on merits in accordance with law.

p. 269, margin C

3

The appeals are disposed of.

p. 269, margin E

4

The parties may appear before the Tribunal for further proceedings on 9th July, 2018.

p. 269, margin E

5

The appellant may serve a copy of this order on the respondents.

p. 269, margin E