Supreme Court of India

LACHHMAN DASS versus JAGAT RAM AND ORS.

Decided: 20 February 2007
Judges listed: S.B. SINHA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official

[2007] 2 S.C.R. 980 · 2007 INSC 179

Also cited as

(2007) 10 SCC 448 (43 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 6 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

M/S A.P. ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION versus THE TAHSILDAR & ORS. ETC. 27 February 2025 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 55
MAHANADI COAL FIELDS LTD. & ANR. versus MATHIAS ORAM & ORS. 3 November 2022 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 12
RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD versus NEW PINK CITY NIRMAN SAHKARI SAMITI LTD. & ANR. 1 May 2015 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 38
TUKARAM KANA JOSHI & ORS. THR. POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER versus M.I.D.C. & ORS. 2 November 2012 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 7
RAM KISHUN AND ORS. versus STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. 24 May 2012 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 9

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.