Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. versus ASHOKA INFRAWAYS LTD. & ANR.

Decided
18 April 2018
Judges listed
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, R.F. NARIMAN (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[2018] 4 S.C.R. 263 ยท 2018 INSC 360

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

1

Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

p. 264, margin B

2

It is not disputed that the judgment relied upon in the impugned order has since been overruled by a larger bench of the High Court in Viva Highways Ltd. vs. Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation reported in 2017 (2) MPLJ 681. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed.

p. 264, margin B

3

It is made clear that if any arbitration proceedings are pending, the same will now be governed by the above judgment of the High Court.

p. 264, margin C

4

The appeal is disposed of.

p. 264, margin D