Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

MADHYA PRADESH RURAL ROAD DEVELOPMENTAUTHORITY AND ANR. versus BACKBONE ENTERPRISES LIMITED AND ANR.

Decided
18 April 2018
Judges listed
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, R.F. NARIMAN (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)

Citations

Official
[2018] 4 S.C.R. 255 ยท 2018 INSC 360
Not shown
1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Paragraph 1

Delay condoned. Leave granted.

p. 256, margin C

Paragraph 2

In view of judgment of this Court in Va Tech Escher Wyass Flovel Ltd. v. MPSE Board & Another, (2011) 13 SCC 261 having been overruled, the jurisdiction to deal with the dispute in question is vested with the M.P. Arbitration Tribunal constituted under the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983. The direction in the impugned order under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is set aside.

p. 256, margin C

Paragraph 3

The appeals are disposed of.

p. 256, margin D

Paragraph 4

The respondent will be at liberty to take their remedy before the statutory Tribunal in accordance with law.

p. 256, margin E

Paragraph 5

The parties may appear before the M.P. Arbitration Tribunal for further proceedings on 9th July, 2018.

p. 256, margin E

Paragraph 6

The appellant may serve a copy of this order on the respondents.

p. 256, margin F