Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

ZAMEER AHMED LATIFUR REHMAN SHEIKH versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

Decided
23 April 2010
Judges listed
R.V. RAVEENDRAN (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[2010] 4 S.C.R. 1042 · 2010 INSC 237
Also cited as
  • (2010) 5 SCC 246 (14 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown
1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 3 other Supreme Court judgments we hold.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Paragraph 1

By a separate Judgment pronounced today, the three connected Civil Appeals being C.A. Nos. 1975-1977 of 2008 have been dismissed.

p. 1091, margin E

Paragraph 2

We dispose of the present Criminal Appeal with a direction that the Special Court constituted under the MCOCA shall consider the issue raised under Misc. Application No. 142 of 2008 in MCOCA Special Case No. 23 of 2006 on its own merits in light of the findings given by this Court in the said connected appeals, in case-a fresh application is moved by the appeallant herein before the Special Court. N.J. Appeals disposed of.

p. 1091, margin F