Supreme Court of India
KONDOPANT versus ARJUNA AND ORS.
- Decided
- 12 September 1995
- Judges listed
- K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Citations
- Official
- [1995] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 582 · 1995 INSC 566
Cited by
We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.
Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.
The Court's text
Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.
In our order dated May 2, 1995 we had stated that Shri Parekh, Learned counsel appearing for the appellants, had raised ground No. 5 and also produced a certified copy to show that the respondent was declared to be a surplus holder and he was in excess of the land under the Land Ceiling Act. The surplus land was assigned to· the appellants. Since counsel for the review petitioner, viz., the respondents in the S.L.P., had reported that in spite of their contracting the party, they could not get any response from them, we had stated that the declaration of the respondents as a surplus holder is correct and in case he was found to be within the ceiling limit, liberty was given to him to file review petition within a period of two months from today. The said fact is not disputed in the review petition. But additional grounds have now got to be raised. Therefore, that would not be a ground for us to review the order.
pp. 582–583, margin G
The review petition is accordingly dismissed. T.N.A. Petition dismissed.
p. 583, margin A