Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. versus NEELAM NAG & ANR.

Decided
9 November 2016
Judges listed
T.S. THAKUR, A.M. KHANWILKAR (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Order modified

Citations

Official
[2016] 8 S.C.R. 436

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Paragraph numbering in our copy is uncertain (unnumbered_in_numbered_era). Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

The following modification/correction shall be treated as part the judgment dated 16.09.2016 in the aforementioned appeal:- (i) The word "Neelam Nag" in the cause title shall be read

p. 436, margin E

" Neelam Nag & Anr." (ii) The word "respondent" whereever referred in the judgment shall be read as "respondent No. I".

p. 436, margin F