Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

ARVIND GUPTA versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Decided
1 October 2012
Judges listed
RAJENDRA MAL LODHA, ANIL R. DAVE (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Dismissed

Citations

Official
[2012] 8 S.C.R. 1058 · 2012 INSC 441
Also cited as
  • (2013) 1 SCC 393 (5 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

1

We have heard Mr. Santosh Paul, learned counsel for the petitioner.

p. 1058, margin G

2

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) has no power to give performance audit report and the Regulations on Audit and Accounts, 2007 (for short "Regulations") framed under the Comptroller & Auditor General's (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Services) Act, 1971 (for short "1971 Act") empowering the CAG to conduct performance audit are violative of the Constitution.

pp. 1058–1059, margin G

3

Article 149 of the Constitution of India provides that CAG shall perform such duties and exercise such powers in relation to the accounts of the Union and of the States and of any other authority or body as may be prescribed by or under any law made by Parliament. In pursuance of Article 149 of the Constitution, 1971 Act has been enacted. Amongst other provisions in 1971 Act, Section 16 provides that it shall be the duty of the CAG to audit all receipts which are payable into the Consolidated Fund of India and of each State and of each Union Territory having a Legislative Assembly and to satisfy himself that the rules and procedures in that behalf are designed to secure an effective check on the assessment, collection and proper allocation of revenue and are being duly observed and for this purpose make such examination of the accounts as he thinks fit and report thereon.

p. 1059, margin B

4

CAG's function to carry out examinations into economy, efficiency and effectiveness with which Government has used its resources is inbuilt in the 1971 Act. Performance audit reports prepared under the Regulations have to be viewed accordingly. We find no unconstitutionality in the Regulations. More-over Article 151 of the Constitution provides that the reports of CAG relating to the accounts of the Union shall be submitted to the President, who shall cause them to be laid before each House of Parliament and the reports relating to the accounts of a State shall be submitted to the Governor of the State who shall cause them to be laid before the Legislature of the State. The audit reports, which are submitted by CAG are, thus, subject to scrutiny by the Parliament or the Legislature of the State, as the case may be.

p. 1059, margin C

5

Writ Petition is wholly misconceived and is dismissed accordingly. B.B.B. Writ Petition dismissed.

p. 1059, margin G