Supreme Court of India

JITENDRA AND ANR. versus STATE OF M.P.

Decided: 18 September 2003
Judges listed: K.G. BALAKRISHNAN (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official

[2003] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 918 · 2003 INSC 494

Also cited as

(2004) 10 SCC 562 (50 citing judgments)
(2004) SCC(CRI) 2028 (23 citing judgments)
AIR 2003 SC 4236 (5 citing judgments)
2003 SCC OnLine SC 1038 (2 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 6 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

MANGILAL versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 12 July 2023 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 8 and 1 other paragraph
THAN KUNWAR versus STATE OF HARYANA 2 March 2020 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 29
MOHINDER SINGH versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB 14 August 2018 · bench of 3 judges · cites it at para 13
VIJAY JAIN versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 20 June 2013 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 4 and 2 other paragraphs
ASHOK @ DANGRA JAISWAL versus STATE OF M.P. 5 April 2011 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 13 and 1 other paragraph

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: our copy of this judgment is a PDF that also holds other judgments' text, so a passage found in it could be another judgment's; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.