Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

JAWALA RAM AND ANR. versus STATE OF H.P.

Decided
28 August 1995
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official
[1995] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 115 · 1995 INSC 506

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

As directed by the Court, the Registry issued notice to the standing counsel for the state of Himachal Pradesh, but no appearance has been entered so far. Nobody has appeared also.

p. 115, margin G

Leave Granted.

p. 116, margin A

The appellants have been convicted under ss.451, 426 read with s.34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo two m0nths imprisonment. The High Court postponed the sentence under s.4 of Probation of Offender's Act subject to filing an undertaking of good conduct. Since the appellants had not executed the under taking, the High Court dismissed the appeal. Thus, this appeal by special leave.

p. 116, margin A

In view of the finding of the High Court that the appellants are entitled to Probation of Offender's Act and were directed to execute a bond, and in view of the explanation given by the appellants in the form of an affidavit filed. in this Court, we accept the explanation of non-receipt of the advocate's letter. They have also filed an affidavit in this Court giving · an undertaking that they would keep good conduct for a period of one year. We accept the undertaking and state that they shall remain on probation for a period of one year from today. If they keep good conduct and behaviour during this period, they shall be deemed to have served the sentence. In case they do not, the authorities would be free to take them into custody to serve the sentence imposed by the trial court and affirmed by the High Court.

p. 116, margin B

The appeal is accordingly allowed. T.N.A. Appeal allowed.

p. 116, margin D