Supreme Court of India

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND ORS. versus NIRAJ KUMAR SINGH

Decided: 2 February 2007
Judges listed: S.B. SINHA (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official

[2007] 2 S.C.R. 184 · 2007 INSC 97

Also cited as

(2007) 2 SCC 481 (38 citing judgments)
(2007) 2 SCALE 525 (5 citing judgments)
(2007) 1 SCC(L&S) 668 (4 citing judgments)
AIR 2007 SC 1155 (2 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 8 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, INDIAN BANK versus D. VISALAKSHI AND ANR. 23 September 2019 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 29
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. versus ASSOCIATION OF UNIFIED TELECOM SERVICE PROVIDERS OF INDIA AND ORS. 11 October 2011 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 41
GENERAL MANAGER, UTTARANCHAL JAL SANSTHAN versus LAXMI DEVI AND OTHERS. 15 May 2009 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 22
CHANDRABHAI K. BHOIR & ORS. versus KRISHNA ARJUN BHOIR & ORS. 7 November 2008 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 21
RAJU RAMSING VASAVE versus MAHESH DEORAO BHIVAPURKAR & ORS. 29 August 2008 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 24

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.