Supreme Court of India

PUSHPA DEVI BHAGAT (D) TH. LR. SMT. SADHNA RAI versus RAJINDER SINGH AND ORS.

Decided: 11 July 2006
Judges listed: B.P. SINGH, R.V. RAVEENDRAN (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal: Dismissed

Citations

Official

[2006] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 370 · 2006 INSC 411

Also cited as

(2006) 5 SCC 566 (39 citing judgments)
AIR 2006 SC 2628 (10 citing judgments)
MANU/SC/3016/2006 (2 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown

1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 13 other Supreme Court judgments we hold. The 5 most recent:

MANJUNATH TIRAKAPPA MALAGI AND ANR. versus GURUSIDDAPPA TIRAKAPPA MALAGI (DEAD THROUGH LRS) 21 April 2025 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 12
PRASANTA KUMAR SAHOO & ORS. versus CHARULATA SAHU & ORS. 29 March 2023 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 28
K. SRINIVASAPPA & ORS. versus M. MALLAMMA & ORS. 18 May 2022 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 34
M/S. SREE SURYA DEVELOPERS AND PROMOTERS versus N. SAILESH PRASAD AND ORS. 9 February 2022 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 3 and 1 other paragraph
M.P. HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT BOARD & ANR. versus K.P. DWIVEDI 3 December 2021 · bench of 2 judges · cites it at para 6

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.