Supreme Court of India
COASTAL CHEMICALS LTD. ETC. versus COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, A.P. AND ORS. ETC.
- Decided
- 14 October 1999
- Judges listed
- S.P. BHARUCHA
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Citations
- Official
- [1999] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 694 · 1999 INSC 479
- Not shown
- 1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.
Cited by
Cited in 2 other Supreme Court judgments we hold.
- M/S. MERIDIAN INDUSTRIES LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE
- M/S VANASTHALI TEXTILES INDUSTRIES LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN
Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.
The Court's text
Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.
BHARUCHA, J. CA. No. 2379/91:
p. 695, margin C
On the application of learned counsel for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. CA. No. 3440/91:
p. 695, margin D
The order under challenge was passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh on a writ petition filed by the appellant. The writ petition was dismissed and the appellant is here by way of special leave to appeal.
p. 695, margin E
The appellant purchased natural gas from the first respondent, the Oil and Natural Gas Commission. It used the natural gas as fuel for the manufacture of paper and paper products. It claimed that it was entitled to the concessional rate of tax that was provided for under Section 5-B(l) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. Originally this was permitted and, when it was not, the appellants filed the writ petition aforestated.
p. 695, margin F
Section 5-B (1) reads thus :
p. 695, margin G
"Notwithstanding anything in this Act, every dealer shall pay, in respect of any sale of goods to another dealer for use by the latter as raw material, component part, sub-assembly part, intermediate, consumables and packing material of any other goods which he intends to manufacture inside the State, a tax at the rate of four paise in the rupee or the rates specified in Sections S, SA and 6B in respect of goods other than declared goods, or Sections 6, SA and 6B in respect of declared goods, whichever is !owe; on the turnover relating to such sale :
pp. 695–696, margin G
Provided that the provisions of this sub-section shall not apply to any sale unless the dealer selling the goods furnished to the assessing authority in the prescribed manner a declaration duty filled in and signed by the dealer to whom the goods are sold containing the prescribed particulars in the prescribed form obtained from the prescribed authority on payment of prescribed
p. 696, margin B
fee."
p. 696, margin C
The argument on behalf of the appellant is that the natural gas is a 'consumable' within the meaning of the aforesaid provision and, therefore, entitled to the concessional rate of tax. The High Court relied upon this Court's judgment in Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax (Law), Board of Revenue (Taxes), Emakulam v. Mis Thomas Stephen & Co. Ltd., Qui/on, [1988] 2 sec 264, to come to the conclusion that the natural gas fell outside the meaning of the word 'consumables' in the said provision.
p. 696, margin C
Our attention was drawn to several judgments of this Court (M/s. J.K. Cotton Spinning & Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur and Anr., [196S] 1 SCR 900, Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Ahmedabad, [1996] S SCC 488, Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi v. M/s. Ballarpur Industries Ltd., [1989] 4 SCC S66 and Commercial Taxes Officer, Circle D., Jaipur v. Rajasthan Electricity Board, Jaipur, [1997) 10 SCC 330, none of which, in our view, has any relevance to the specific point at issue. No judgment has been referred to by the learned counsel for the appellant which deals with the. meaning of the word 'consumables'.
p. 696, margin E
The word 'consumables' in the said provision takes colour from and must be read in the light of the words that are its neighbours, namely, 'raw material', 'component part', 'sub-assembly part' and 'intermediate part' so read, it is clear that the word 'consumables' therein refers only to material which is utilised as an, input in the manufacturing process but is . not identifiable in the final product by reason of the fact that it has got consumed therein. It rs fcir this reason that 'consumables' have been expressly referr~d to in the said provision, though they would fall within the broader scope of the words 'raw material'.
pp. 696–697, margin G
In the case of Thomas Stephen & Co., relied upon in the impugned judgment, it was held that cashew shells used as fuel did not get consumed in the manufacture of other goods and that "consumption must be in the manufacture as raw material".
p. 697, margin B
To use the words of Thomas Stephen & Co. the natural gas used by the appellant does "not tend to the making of the end- product". It is not a 'consumable'.
p. 697, margin C
The appeal is dismissed, with costs. CA. No. 2697191 :
p. 697, margin C
In the light of the order passed in C.A. No. 3440 of 1991, this appeal is dismissed. M.S.J. Appeals dismissed.
p. 697, margin D