Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

JAGBIR SINGH versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS .

Decided
25 March 1996
Judges listed
K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Citations

Official
[1996] 3 S.C.R. 877 · 1996 INSC 443

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Leave granted.

p. 877, margin F

These appeals by special leave arise from the order of the Punjab & Haryana High Court made on 31.3.1994 in Civii'Writ Petition Nos. 15044/93 and 1575/94. The appellant was recruited as a Constable in Haryana Police service against sports quota on September 15, 1977. He was promoted as Head Constable. on July 4, 1984 keeping in view his performance in the. sports. He was also confirmed as a Head Constable on Aµgust 31, 1987. He was served with a show cause notice by Superintendent of Police dated August 11, 19_88 as to why he should not be de-confirmed as Head Constable w.e.f. August 31, 1987. In the meanwhile, he was also promoted as Assistant Sub-Inspector on ad hoc basis on November 22, 1990. While he was conti~uing as Assistant Sub-Inspector, he was provisionally selected to undergo intermediate school course which was to commence from September 15, 1993. He was selected and sent for the training While the appellant was undergoing the training his name was deleted from the list of Head Constables. Consequently, after unsuccessful attempt by representations, · the appellant filed the Writ Petition No. 1575/94 in the High Court challenging the validity of the second show cause notice dated December 14, 1993. It was dismissed by the High Court by order dated March 31, 1994. The other writ petition challenging de-confirmation was dismissed. Thus, these appeals by special leave.

pp. 877–878, margin F

In view of the admitted position that he was recruited under the sports quota and also promoted thereunder, his promotion is according to rules. The controversy raised was considered by this Court in Risha/ Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors., JT (1992) 2 SC 157). It was held therein that though the order indicated that the promotion was on ad hoc basis, but in view of Rule 13.1(1) of Chapter XIII of the Punjab Police Rules, 1934 as ·is applicable to the Haryana State the promotion given to the appellant was a regular promotion and it cannot be considered to be ad hoc. As a consequence, he was held to be entitled to confirmation in that position. In view of the above legal position we arc of the view that the appellant is entitled to the regular promotion.

p. 878, margin C

The appeals ar!" accordingly allowed. He must be deemed to have been regularised as Head Constable. All the consequential benefits should also be given to the appellant. No costs. R.P. Appeals allowed.

p. 878, margin E