Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

VIJAY DHANUKA ETC. versus NAJIMA MAMTAJ ETC.

Decided
27 March 2014
Judges listed
C.K. PRASAD (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Dismissed

Citations

Official
[2014] 4 S.C.R. 171 · 2014 INSC 216
Also cited as
  • (2014) 14 SCC 638 (70 citing judgments)
  • (2015) 1 SCC(CRI) 479 (15 citing judgments)
  • AIR 2014 SCW 2095 (3 citing judgments)
  • MANU/SC/0251/2014 (3 citing judgments)

Learned from how other judgments cite this one, in their text or in the official Supreme Court Reports' lists of cases they refer to: each is cited this way by at least two judgments, and at least twice as often as any other citation to this judgment in that report. We hold no commercial reporter's text, only these citation strings.

Not shown
1 other citation string that other judgments attach to this one, on evidence too thin or too divided to publish.

Cited by

Cited in 2 other Supreme Court judgments we hold.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

We show no paragraphs for this judgment: the judgment's start was not found in our copy, so its stored text may include the editorial headnote; we could not check the quote or pin-cite against it.