Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

SUNDERBHAI AMBALAL DESAI versus STATE OF GUJARAT

Decided
18 November 2002
Judges listed
M.B. SHAH, D.M. DHARMADHIKARI (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Disposed off

Citations

Official
[2002] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 217 · 2002 INSC 475

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

Unnumbered paragraph

Heard learned counsel for the parties. In our view, no further directions are required to be given in these matters. However, it is made clear that in case where accused dispute that he is not involved in the alleged incident and no article was found from him then such endorsement be taken on the photograph. Further with regard to the vehicle also, it is made clear that there may not be any necessity of producing the vehicle before the Court and the Seizure Report may be sufficient. The Special Leave Petitions are disposed of, accordingly. R.P. Petitions disposed of.

pp. 217–218, margin G