Certo Is this judgment real?
Beta, Supreme Court only. We check Supreme Court of India judgments only for now: a High Court citation reads "Not in our corpus", which never means it does not exist.

Supreme Court of India

ROHITH THAMMANA GOWDA versus RAJINI NALINI RAMESH

Decided
14 September 2022
Judges listed
BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, C.T. RAVIKUMAR (as the open data lists them; this may not name the whole bench)
Disposal
Directions issued

Citations

Official
[2022] 5 S.C.R. 919 · 2022 INSC 1321

Cited by

We found no other Supreme Court judgment we hold that cites this one.

Counted only in the Supreme Court judgments we hold whose text we could read, not in High Court judgments. We match each citation to a judgment automatically, so a citation we cannot match is not counted. "Cited" says only that a judgment refers to this one, not whether it followed, distinguished or overruled it.

The Court's text

Paragraphs from our copy of the Supreme Court Reports print, with the Court's own paragraph numbers, the printed page and, where printed, the margin letter. The Court did not number this judgment's paragraphs, so they are listed by page. Paragraph numbering in our copy is uncertain (unnumbered_in_numbered_era). Link to paragraph N with #para-N.

In addition to the directions issued in paragraph 18(i) to (iv) of the judgment dated 29.07.2022, the following direction shall be read as direction No. 18 (v) of the said judgment:

p. 919, margin G

“The petitioner-husband shall not take any coercive steps against the respondent-wife in any of the proceedings pending in the Superior Court of Washington, County of King, United States of America.”

pp. 919–920, margin G

The parties shall file a joint application before the Superior Court of Washington, County of King, United States of America duly signed by their respective counsel for mirroring the judgment dated 29.07.2022.

p. 920, margin A

List this matter after 10 days to enable the parties place on record the mirror order.

p. 920, margin B